2006 MISSISSIPPI POLL

 

This telephone survey was conducted by the Survey Research Unit of the Social Science Research Center at Mississippi State University with facilities that permit simultaneous use of twenty telephones. The SSRC is directed by Dr. Arthur Cosby, and the Survey Research Unit is directed by Dr. Wolfgang Frese. A random sampling technique was used to select the households, and a random method was employed in sampling each individual within the household. No substitutions were permitted, and ten callbacks were made. Calls were made from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weeknights, and from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 1PM to 9PM on Sundays. A Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing System (CATI) was used to collect the data. Twenty-four undergraduate students in the Political Analysis class made the phone calls. Five hundred seventy four adult Mississippi residents were interviewed from April 3-23. The response rate was 50%. The results were adjusted by demographic characteristics in order to achieve a representative sample. With 574 people surveyed, the sample error is plus or minus 4.2%, which means that if every Mississippi resident had been interviewed, the results could differ from those reported here by as much as 4.2%. Some analyses examine only "likely voters," who consist of 312 individuals in the sample, which results in a sample error level of 5.8% for results in those analyses. The Director of the Survey was Stephen Shaffer in the MSU Political Science Department.

Note: to be as efficient as possible, results from this and future Mississippi Polls are posted on this website rather than distributed in any other way. Anyone interested in interpretations of the complexity of public opinion in modern day Mississippi are encouraged to consult the website above, as well as talk with MSU political science majors who have completed classes in American Politics. Questions about the poll can be directed to Dr. Shaffer by e-mail at the following address: kauai@ps.msstate.edu

The exact wording of all of the questions in the 2006 Mississippi Poll is on the web at: http://sds17.pspa.msstate.edu/poll/mspoll2006.html

Naturally, all questions asked are fairly general, in order to try to measure the views of average citizens who typically are not as knowledgeable of public affairs issues as are elected officials. Therefore, poll results are not always directly comparable to the controversies facing elected officials. In any event, the history of the Mississippi Poll does provide an interesting and informative insight into the “average Mississippian,” and raises many thought-provoking questions for our students and political observers.

 

REPUBLICANS HOLD EARLY LEAD IN ONE HYPOTHETICAL PAIRING IN THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Question Wording: If the presidential election was held today, and the candidates were New York Senator Hillary Clinton the Democrat and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice the Republican, whom would you vote for? Clinton or Rice? (Asked of 312 likely voters in the general election)

Clinton         = 39.9%

Rice          =  50.9%

Undecided   =  9.2%

REPUBLICANS HOLD EARLY LEAD IN ONE HYPOTHETICAL PAIRING IN THE 2007 GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION

Question Wording: If the election for governor was held today, and the candidates were Democratic former Governor Ronnie Musgrove and Republican Governor Haley Barbour, whom would you vote for? Musgrove or Barbour? (Asked of 312 likely voters in the general election)

Musgrove         = 40.4%

Barbour          =  51.9%

Undecided   =  7.7%

HILLARY CLINTON VIEWED AS MUCH MORE LIBERAL THAN AVERAGE MISSISSIPPIAN

Asked of 574 adult Mississippi residents: "Please label the following political figures as very liberal, somewhat liberal, moderate or middle of the road, somewhat conservative, or very conservative... President George W. Bush, Democratic Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, Governor Haley Barbour, and Lieutenant Governor Amy Tuck."

The last row indicates voters' responses to the following question: "What about your political beliefs? Do you consider yourself: very liberal, somewhat liberal, moderate or middle of the road, somewhat conservative, or very conservative?"

 

 

VERY LIBERAL

SOMEWHAT LIBERAL

MODERATE

SOMEWHAT CONSERVATIVE

VERY CONSERVATIVE

DON’T KNOW

Hillary Clinton

39%

15%

15%

7%

10%

14%

George W. Bush

5%

8%

19%

32%

23%

13%

Haley Barbour

3%

9%

25%

31%

15%

17%

Amy Tuck

6%

11%

28%

22%

5%

28%

Residents' Own Views

4%

12%

32%

28%

20%

4%

Note: Percentages total 100% across each row.

 

BARBOUR’S POPULARITY REMAINS SIMILAR TO PREVIOUS REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR


"I'm going to ask you to rate the job performance of a few political figures and institutions. Rate each of them as excellent, good, fair, or poor. What about?" (Note: asked of 312 likely voters; results from previous governors included)

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

No Opinion

 

Favorable Rating (E+G)/

(E+G+F+P)

Winter

1981

12%

46%

34%

6%

2%

 

 

59%

1982

15%

43%

32%

8%

2%

 

59%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allain

1984

6%

33%

44%

9%

8%

 

 

42%

1986

10%

39%

40%

11%

0%

 

49%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mabus

 

1988

14%

39%

29%

4%

14%

 

 

62%

1990

17%

31%

31%

20%

1%

 

48%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fordice

1992

8%

36%

21%

22%

13%

 

 

51%

1994

19%

36%

32%

12%

1%

 

56%

1996

17%

34%

29%

16%

4%

 

53%

1998

11%

44%

32%

9%

4%

 

57%

1999

11%

34%

36%

13%

6%

 

48%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Musgrove

2000

14%

39%

18%

6%

23%

 

 

69%

2002

9%

32%

35%

18%

6%

 

44%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barbour

 

2004

 

12%

 

 

28%

 

25%

 

12%

 

23%

 

 

52%

2006

16%

32%

32%

16%

4%

 

50%

Note: Percentages in first five columns total 100% across each row.

Source (previous years): The New Mississippi: Political and Partisan Attitudes in the 1990s. Available on world wide web at: http://www.ssrc.msstate.edu/Publications/srrs99-1.pdf



LEGISLATURE'S POPULARITY DIPS FROM HISTORIC HIGHS

 

"I'm going to ask you to rate the job performance of a few political figures and institutions. Rate each of them as excellent, good, fair, or poor. What about the Mississippi state legislature?" (Asked of entire sample)

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

No Opinion

 

Favorable Rating (E+G) - (P)

1981

3%

36%

46%

8%

7%

 

+31

1982

5%

24%

43%

15%

13%

 

+14

1984

3%

25%

51%

11%

10%

 

+17

1986

2%

27%

41%

17%

13%

 

+12

1988

4%

29%

46%

12%

9%

 

+21

1990

2%

23%

50%

16%

9%

 

+9

1992

2%

16%

44%

29%

9%

 

-11

1994

2%

22%

45%

22%

9%

 

+2

1996

5%

29%

44%

12%

10%

 

+22

1998

5%

28%

45%

9%

13%

 

+24

1999

5%

35%

39%

8%

13%

 

+32

2000

3%

34%

44%

9%

10%

 

+28

2002

4%

31%

38%

15%

12%

 

+20

 

2004

4%

30%

43%

14%

9%

 

+20

2006

2%

29%

42%

17%

10%

 

+14

Note: Percentages in first five columns total 100% across each row. In calculating the Favorable Rating, "fair" is an ambiguous category when rating an institution, so it is excluded from the analysis.

Source (previous years): The New Mississippi: Political and Partisan Attitudes in the 1990s.

Available on world wide web at: http://www.ssrc.msstate.edu/Publications/srrs99-1.pdf

 

GENERAL TRUST IN PUBLIC OFFICIALS DIPS AGAIN

Question Wording (asked of entire sample): “How much of the time do you think you can trust public officials in Mississippi to do what is right—almost always, most of the time, only some of the time, or rarely?”

YEAR

ALWAYS

MOST OF TIME

SOME OF TIME

RARELY

NO OPINION

POSITIVITY- (always+most of time) -(rarely)

1981

8%

39%

42%

8%

3%

+39

1990

5

27

49

17

2

+15

1992

2

14

57

26

1

-10

1994

4

25

44

25

1

+4

1996

5

26

47

20

2

+11

1998

6

30

46

14

4

+22

1999

5

38

40

13

4

+30

2000

5

32

46

15

2

+22

2002

6

35

46

12

1

+29

2004

3

29

45

22

1

+10

2006

4

23

49

23

1

+4

 

A HISTORICALLY DEMOCRATIC STATE IS TODAY VERY DIVIDED IN PARTISANSHIP

Question wording (asked of entire sample): “Generally speaking, do you consider yourself a Democrat, Republican, Independent, or what?” (Independents were asked: “Do you think of yourself as closer to the Democratic party or to the Republican party?”) Those leaning towards either party were considered identifiers of that party.

YEAR

DEMOCRATS

INDEPENDENTS

REPUBLICANS

PARTY ADVANTAGE

1981

61%

7%

32%

29D

1982

61%

14%

25%

36D

1984

56%

15%

29%

27D

1986

54%

10%

36%

18D

1988

53%

13%

34%

19D

1990

56%

8%

36%

20D

1992

47%

13%

40%

7D

1994

47%

12%

41%

6D

1996

48%

10%

42%

6D

1998

47%

11%

42%

5D

1999

51%

10%

39%

12D

2000

54%

6%

40%

14D

2002

45%

8%

47%

2R

2004

43%

11%

46%

3R

2006

47%

6%

47%

0

Note: Percentages in columns 2, 3, and 4 total 100% across each row. Values in the last column indicate the Democratic or Republican advantage in each year, and is the difference in percentages between the two parties.

Source (previous years): The New Mississippi: Political and Partisan Attitudes in the 1990s. Available on world wide web at: http://www.ssrc.msstate.edu/Publications/srrs99-1.pdf

 

SUPPORT FOR SEX EQUALITY LEVELS OFF

Asked of entire sample: “Do you agree or disagree with the following statement—Women should take care of running their homes and leave running the country up to men?” Those agreeing with this statement are classified as “Against Equal Rights for women” and those disagreeing with the statement are classified as “For Equal Rights”.

YEAR

AGAINST EQUAL RIGHTS

FOR EQUAL RIGHTS

NO OPINION

1984

41%

53%

6%

1986

39

56

5

1988

39

55

6

1990

34

61

5

1994

24

70

6

1996

28

68

4

1998

25

70

5

1999

22

73

5

2004

25

69

6

2006

26

69

5

 

QUALITY OF LIFE IS RATED POSITIVELY, BUT FLUCTUATING

Asked of entire sample: “Overall, how would you rate Mississippi as a place to live—excellent, good, fair, or poor?”

YEAR

EXCELLENT

GOOD

FAIR

POOR

POSITIVE: EXCELLENT PLUS GOOD

1981

37%

40%

18%

5%

+77

1986

29%

38%

26%

7%

+67

1992

20%

46%

25%

9%

+66

1994

27%

43%

24%

6%

+70

1996

26%

50%

21%

3%

+76

1998

30%

50%

18%

2%

+80

1999

28%

45%

23%

4%

+73

2000

28%

44%

24%

4%

+72

2002

26%

48%

20%

6%

+74

2004

28%

41%

25%

6%

+69

2006

32%

40%

23%

5%

+72

Note: Percentages in columns 2 thru 5 total 100% across each row. The last column combines the most positive responses, those rating Mississippi’s quality of life as excellent or good. Some results from previous years are available at: http://www.ssrc.msstate.edu/Publications/srrs99-1.pdf

 

FINANCIAL SATISFACTION AT HISTORIC AVERAGE

Asked of entire sample: “We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. So far as you and your family are concerned, would you say that you are pretty well satisfied with your present financial situation, more or less satisfied, or not satisfied at all?”

YEAR

Pretty Well Satisfied

More or Less Satisfied

Not Satisfied At All

No Opinion

Satisfaction Level- (Pretty Well Sat. – Not Satisfied)

1984

39%

41%

19%

1%

+20

1986

32

47

21

0

+11

1988

38

43

18

1

+20

1990

35

46

18

1

+17

1992

29

41

30

0

-1

1994

36

41

22

1

+14

1996

43

37

20

0

+23

1998

41

40

19

0

+22

2004

39

38

23

0

+16

2006

39

40

21

0

+18

 

GEOGRAPHIC MOBILITY AT HISTORIC AVERAGE

Asked of entire sample: “How likely do you think it will be that you will be living in your community five years from now? Definitely no, probably no, probably yes, or definitely yes?”

YEAR

DEFINITELY NO

PROBABLY NO

PROBABLY YES

DEFINITELY YES

DON’T KNOW

YES (Definite+Probably)

1990

6%

12%

38%

40%

4%

+78

1992

6

11

34

47

2

+81

1994

6

11

35

47

1

+82

1996

5

14

33

46

2

+79

1998

6

12

34

48

0

+82

2004

11

14

31

42

2

+73

2006

7

13

28

50

2

+78

 

MISSISSIPPIANS VALUE STATE PROGRAMS

Asked of 574 adult Mississippi residents: "Now I'm going to ask you about some issues facing state and local government in Mississippi. As you know, most of the money government spends comes from the taxes you and others pay. For each of the following, please tell me whether you think state and local government in Mississippi should be spending more, less, or about the same as now."

STATE PROGRAM

SPEND MORE

SPEND THE SAME

SPEND LESS

NO OPINION

Public Grade Schools and  High Schools

79%

15%

5%

1%

Health Care and Hospitals

74

21

4

1

Public Colleges and Universities

60

29

7

4

Streets and Highways

60

33

5

2

Industrial Growth and Development

57

32

7

4

Programs for the Poor

61

25

12

2

Police Forces

62

30

6

2

Child Day Care Facilities

54

32

10

4

Encouraging Tourism

41

36

20

3

Environmental Programs

48

35

12

5

Note: Percentages total 100% across each row. Some results from previous years are available at: http://www.ssrc.msstate.edu/Publications/srrs99-1.pdf